Supporting risk
Theft & Fraud Exposure
Comprehensive claim exposure driven by vehicle theft and fraud environment signals. This page explains the public signals behind theft & fraud exposure and how they tend to show up in claims and pricing pressure in Crawford County.
County signal
2
/ 100
Vehicle theft rates are below the national distribution.
Sources
Public, regulator-grade inputs used for this risk.
- FBI UCR/NIBRS
- NICB reports
- NICB fraud reports
- State DOI fraud unit summaries
Signals tracked
What we measure for this risk
Vehicle theft baseline
Reported motor vehicle thefts in 2023 for Crawford County.
0 thefts per 100k vehicles.
Coverage: Observed totals. Source: FBI CDE NIBRS (motor vehicle theft).
Core signals
Primary public inputs that define theft exposure in Crawford County.
Vehicle theft rate
Auto thefts per 100k vehicles with trend direction.
Sources: FBI UCR/NIBRS, NICB reports
Additional signals
Supplemental theft and fraud signals added as coverage expands.
Fraud environment
Fraud prevalence signal (low / medium / high).
Sources: NICB fraud reports, State DOI fraud unit summaries
Why theft exposure matters
Theft exposure captures how frequently vehicles are stolen and the loss pressure that follows.
- Higher theft rates mean more comprehensive claims and replacements.
- Persistent theft pressure can lift premiums and tighten underwriting.
- Fraud environments can increase scrutiny and slow claim resolution.